Proceedings guide

Post-Grant Review (PGR)

Post-grant review lets anyone other than the patent owner challenge an issued patent on almost any ground of invalidity, but only within nine months of grant and only for patents with a first-inventor-to-file effective date (on or after March 16, 2013). Review is instituted if it is more likely than not that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable.

Key Facts

Statute
35 U.S.C. §§ 321–329
Who can file
Anyone except the patent owner
Window
Within 9 months of grant or reissue
Eligible patents
First-inventor-to-file (effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013)
Grounds
Any § 282(b)(2) or (3) ground, such as §§ 101, 102, 103, 112
Institution standard
More likely than not that a claim is unpatentable
Final decision
Within 1 year of institution (extendable 6 months)
Estoppel
Yes, § 325(e)
On this page
  1. The PGR timeline
  2. Who may file, and when
  3. What you can argue
  4. Institution standard
  5. Timeline and burden
  6. Estoppel
  7. When to choose PGR

The PGR timeline

  1. Within 9 months of grantPetition filedAny § 282(b)(2)/(3) ground, with supporting evidence.
  2. Up to 3 monthsPatent owner preliminary responseOptional.
  3. Up to 3 more monthsInstitution decisionMore likely than not that at least one claim is unpatentable.
  4. About 12 monthsTrialBriefing, discovery, depositions and oral hearing.
  5. Within 1 year of institutionFinal written decisionAppealable to the Federal Circuit.

Post-grant review (PGR) is the America Invents Act’s early-window challenge. It is broader than inter partes review but must be filed quickly.

Who may file, and when

  • Who: any person who is not the patent owner (35 U.S.C. § 321(a)).
  • Deadline: no later than nine months after the date of the grant of the patent or of the issuance of a reissue patent (§ 321(c)).
  • Eligible patents: only patents subject to the first-inventor-to-file provisions, meaning at least one claim with an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013.

What you can argue

Any ground that could be raised as a defense of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 282(b)(2) or (3). That includes:

  • Patent-ineligible subject matter (§ 101)
  • Anticipation and obviousness, based on any prior art and not only patents and printed publications (§§ 102, 103)
  • Written description, enablement and indefiniteness (§ 112, other than best mode)

Institution standard

The Board institutes PGR if the petition shows that it is more likely than not that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable. A petition can also be instituted if it raises a novel or unsettled legal question that is important to other patents or applications (§ 324(a), (b)). The patent owner may file a preliminary response, as in IPR.

Timeline and burden

Once instituted, the trial follows the same one-year schedule as IPR, extendable by up to six months for good cause (§ 326(a)(11)). The petitioner must prove unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence (§ 326(e)).

Estoppel

After a final written decision, the petitioner, its real party in interest, and its privies cannot assert in a later USPTO, district court or ITC proceeding that a claim is invalid on any ground the petitioner raised or reasonably could have raised during the PGR (§ 325(e)). Because PGR grounds are broad, the “reasonably could have raised” scope is correspondingly broad.

When to choose PGR

Choose PGR when you need non-prior-art arguments (especially § 101 or § 112), the patent is recent enough to be eligible, and you can prepare a full petition inside nine months. After that window, consider IPR or ex parte reexamination. The comparison chart lays out the differences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the deadline to file a PGR?

A petition must be filed no later than nine months after the patent is granted, or after a reissue patent is granted (35 U.S.C. § 321(c)).

Which patents can be challenged in PGR?

Patents that contain, or ever contained, a claim with an effective filing date on or after March 16, 2013 (the first-inventor-to-file provisions of the America Invents Act).

How is the PGR institution standard different from IPR?

PGR is instituted if it is more likely than not that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable, or if the petition raises a novel or unsettled legal question important to other patents (35 U.S.C. § 324). IPR uses a "reasonable likelihood" standard.

Primary Sources

  1. 35 U.S.C. §§ 321–329 (Post-grant review)
  2. 37 C.F.R. Part 42, Subparts A and C
  3. USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Educational information; not legal advice. Statutes, rules and USPTO practice change. Confirm against the primary sources and consult a registered patent practitioner before acting. Disclaimer.