Proceedings guide
Ex Parte Reexamination
Ex parte reexamination lets anyone, including the patent owner, ask the USPTO to re-examine an issued patent in light of prior patents or printed publications that raise a substantial new question of patentability. It can be requested at any time during the patent's enforceable life, the requester has limited participation, and no estoppel attaches to the requester.
Key Facts
- Statute
- 35 U.S.C. §§ 301–307
- Who can request
- Anyone, including the patent owner
- When
- Any time the patent is enforceable
- Basis
- Substantial new question from patents or printed publications
- Order decision
- Within 3 months of the request
- Requester role
- The request, plus one reply
- Estoppel
- None
- Handled by
- Central Reexamination Unit
On this page
The reexamination process
- Any timeRequest filedPatents and printed publications, with an explanation of the substantial new question.
- Within 3 monthsOrder or denialThe Office decides whether a substantial new question exists.
- About 2 monthsPatent owner statementOptional; may include amendments.
- About 2 monthsRequester replyOnly if the owner filed a statement.
- OngoingExaminationEx parte between the owner and the examiner, with special dispatch.
- EndReexamination certificateClaims confirmed, cancelled or amended.
Ex parte reexamination has existed since 1981 and was not replaced by the America Invents Act. It remains a distinct tool because it is open to anyone, long-lived, and does not create IPR-style estoppel.
Who may request, and when
Any person, including the patent owner, may request reexamination of any claim at any time during the period of enforceability (35 U.S.C. § 302). The requester need not be sued or otherwise be in a dispute.
What the request must show
A request must identify prior patents or printed publications and explain how they raise a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) for at least one claim (§§ 301–303). Other invalidity grounds, such as § 101 or § 112, cannot be the basis for an SNQ, although § 112 issues can arise once the claims are being amended.
How the process works
- Request filed with the required fee and claim charts.
- Order decision: the Office decides whether an SNQ exists, within three months of the request (§ 303).
- If ordered, the patent owner may file a statement and amendments; the requester may reply to that statement (§ 304).
- Examination proceeds like ordinary prosecution, handled by examiners in the Central Reexamination Unit, with “special dispatch” (§ 305). There are no discovery, depositions or oral hearings between the parties.
- Certificate issues, confirming, cancelling or amending claims (§ 307).
Amendments and intervening rights
The patent owner may amend claims or add new ones, but may not enlarge the scope of the claims (§ 305). Amended or new claims can create intervening rights for third parties who practiced the invention before the certificate.
Appeals
The patent owner may appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and then the Federal Circuit. A third-party requester has no corresponding appeal right in ex parte reexamination (§ 306).
Strengths and trade-offs
| Strength | Trade-off |
|---|---|
| No standing needed; no statutory filing deadline | Prior art limited to patents and printed publications |
| No estoppel against the requester | Requester has little role after the request and reply |
| Lower cost than a trial | Outcome can be amended claims, which may cut off past damages through intervening rights |
Compare with inter partes review, and for owner-initiated options see supplemental examination and reissue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a deadline to request ex parte reexamination?
Not in the way IPR has one. A request may be filed at any time during the enforceability of the patent (35 U.S.C. § 302).
Can the requester appeal?
In ex parte reexamination the patent owner, but not a third-party requester, may appeal an adverse decision to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and then the Federal Circuit (35 U.S.C. § 306).
Primary Sources
Related Pages
- Proceedings guideInter Partes Review (IPR)Inter partes review is a trial before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in which anyone other than the patent…
- Proceedings guideSupplemental ExaminationSupplemental examination lets a patent owner ask the USPTO to consider, reconsider or correct information…
- Proceedings guideReissue ApplicationsA reissue application lets a patent owner surrender an issued patent and have a corrected one granted when an…
- GuidePost-Grant Proceedings Comparison ChartUse this chart to compare the USPTO's post-grant proceedings: who can use each proceeding, when it is…
Educational information; not legal advice. Statutes, rules and USPTO practice change. Confirm against the primary sources and consult a registered patent practitioner before acting. Disclaimer.